This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brushwood, D. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Liability Implications of Innovative Drug Therapy: The Significance of Clinical Guidelines in Establishing the Legal Standard of Care

College of Pharmacy, The University of Florida, P.O. Box 100496, Gainesville, FL 32610-0496

The use of the clinical practice guideline (CPG) has become widespread in contemporary health care. For some health care providers, there may be a perceived "safe haven" from liability for strict compliance with a relevant CPG. Pointing to an objective standard, such as a CPG, the health care provider may feel secure in defending care that was provided to a patient, when called to account for a bad outcome. The benefit of any CPG is that it standardizes practice at an acceptably high level. The complimentary risk of a CPG is that it may stifle innovation based on newly discovered or newly appreciated data that were not considered when the CPG was developed. The trend in malpractice law is to recognize a CPG as relevant to the applicable standard of care, but not to equate a CPG with the standard of care. In fact, an outdated CPG may fail to reflect the standard of care, if new scientific or medical knowledge has been validated. The health care provider who adheres to an outdated CPG is at greater risk of liability than the health care provider who spurns the outdated CPG in favor of innovative practice based on valid new information. Innovation, as opposed to experimentation, is recognized as a necessary component of competent health care. The health care provider who adheres to outdated traditional medicine, spurning new developments validated by evidence, has clearly expanded exposure to liability.

Key Words: clinical practice guideline • liability • innovation • standard of practice

Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 279-289 (2002)
DOI: 10.1106/VEXN-Y15M-RU3U


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?