This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clements, E. A. Articles by Shaskos, J. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Current Controversies in Gastrointestinal Decontamination

Department of Pharmacy Services, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, elizabeth.clements{at}spectrum-health.org

Jamie B. Shaskos, PharmD

Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

Most poisonings reported to American poison control centers occur in the home. The most common route of exposure is ingestion, which is responsible for most fatalities. The goal of gastrointestinal decontamination is to prevent absorption of the toxin. Trends in treating poisoned patients have changed over the past few decades in light of a move toward practicing evidence-based medicine. Efficacy and clinical outcome have come into question and have led to position papers published recently regarding syrup of ipecac, gastric lavage, activated charcoal, and whole-bowel irrigation. These different methods of decontamination and the scientific data supporting each one will be reviewed, and the current controversies surrounding each will be discussed.

Key Words: Toxicology • activated charcoal • gastrointestinal decontamination

Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 18, No. 3, 209-220 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0897190005276750


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?