| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Should Oral Contraceptives Be Sold Without a Prescription? An Analysis of Womens Risk and Benefit Perceptions Regarding Nonprescription Birth Control PillsPharmacy and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, St. Johns University, Utopia Parkway, Jamaica, NY 11439nayakr{at}stjohns.edu
College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Department of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Despite expert opinions favoring a switch of oral contracepwho were surveyed, 37% favored the acquisition of OCs with-tives (OCs) from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) staout a prescription. Women associated the OTC system for obtus, limited empirical evidence currently exists for indicating taining OCs with increased likelihood of adverse medical a consumer preference for nonprescription OCs. The objec-consequences and the prescription-only system with an intive of this study was to measure perceptions of women re-creased likelihood of pregnancy avoidance. Women who pregarding nonprescription OCs and to assess their preference ferred nonprescription pills reported more favorable attifor acquiring OCs without a prescription. A cross-sectional tudes toward their use and stronger intentions to buy them survey research design employing a combination of mail and without a prescription. Perceptions of OC benefits seem to telephone survey methodologies was used to measure per-play a more significant role in decisions to favor nonprescripceptions, beliefs, and attitudes of a randomly selected sample tion pills than the perceptions of OC risks for those women of university women (N = 500) regarding the consequences of who preferred OTC pills. Currently, the support for nonpre-using OCs with and without a prescription. Of the women scription OCs among women is only moderate.
Key Words: Oral contraceptives birth control pills nonprescription OTC attitudes
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 18, No. 6,
479-485 (2005) |
|||