SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenealy, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Current Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Laureen K. Kenealy, PharmD

University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City

Courtney B. Christenson, PharmD

University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City

Casey B. Williams, PharmD, BCOP

University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, cwilliams9{at}kumc.edu

Management strategies for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have changed dramatically since the introduction of imatinib into clinical trials in 1998. Imatinib is generally accepted, at present, to be the most appropriate initial therapy for newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML; however, a proportion of patients will not respond adequately. Many of these patients may benefit from alternative treatment strategies, including second- and third-generation BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Additionally, with continued improvements in molecular monitoring, it is much more clinically routine to measure ongoing treatment efficacy or characterize pending disease relapse via molecular analysis. The challenge is to now combine molecular monitoring information with timely treatment decisions to achieve the best possible outcomes. Additionally, unanswered questions about HSCT remain, and include (1) What is the role of allogeneic HSCT in CML? (2) What type of transplant, reduced-intensity or myeloablative, should be performed? The goal of this article is to provide an overview of where we stand in the treatment of CML in 2008.

Key Words: CML • review • imatinib • dasatinib • nilotinib

Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 21, No. 2, 116-125 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0897190008314778
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement