SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bobula, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines and Principles: An International Comparison

Joel Bobula

This article compares and contrasts the PhRMA Methodological and Conduct Principles for Pharmacoeconomic Research and the pharmacoeconomic guidelines/principles from Australia, Great Britain, and Canada. Whereas the UK Guidance is the most general and the least prescriptive of the four sets of guidelines/ principles, the Canadian Guideline is the most detailed and prescriptive in nature. The PhRMA Principles consists of a set of broad principles that will foster high quality pharmacoeconomic research without impeding further methodological development of the field. The main focus of the PhRMA Principles is to rely on full disclosure and transparency of methods to permit knowledgeable readers to judge for themselves the adequacy of the methodological approach or to alter key parameters of the analyses to determine their impact. Copyright © 1995 by W.B. Saunders Company

Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 8, No. 4, 185-192 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/089719009500800407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement